Christine AmiThoughts about holding down Anthro at community colleges A few months ago I received an email invitation to speak at an anthropology conference. At first I thought it was SPAM - I've been getting a healthy amount of conference spam lately. But when I realized that not only was there in fact a group of real people behind the email - but they were anthropologists....and they were all community college professors....Boy, was I excited! You see, I was adopted and eventually raised by anthropologists during my graduate studies - all the while - not receiving a typical anthropology degree. During my Spanish Literature master's program - anthropologists at the University of Maryland, College Park, Aubrey Williams and Regina Harrison let me sit in their classes, provided key advising, encouraged me to continue learning my Diné language, offered me additional reading lists, discussed those reading lists with me on their own time, and with the case of Dr. Williams, even left me his field notes and book collection on the Navajo people. Never was there a 'white guilt,' token Indian' relationship - they saw something, or I felt something that pulled me to not only them, but the methods and ethics they practiced. My pull to anthropology continued into my Native American Studies doctoral program being nurtured Zoila Mendoza, Stefano Varese, Victor Montejo, MaríaElena Garcia, and Janet S. Shibamoto-Smith. I soaked in everything I could from them, all while working on a NAS degree. They molded me in the various dimensions of socio-cultural anthropology, all the while letting my story and my approach through Indigenous methodologies take root. I'm an undercover anthropologist with NAS transcripts that credential me to teach anthropology. So when I returned home to teach on the Navajo Nation - with no Native American studies program in sight - Anthropology is where I called home. I started with teaching ethnographic methods, North American and US Indians, and cultural anthropology classes. Slowly I started transitioning these courses from the outdated Vine Deloria hated Indian portrayal and betrayal approach into a NAS endeavors. You can check out Deloria's keen words about anthropologists here in his infamous Custer Died for Your Sins. I wasn't trying to decolonize anthropology (vomit) - I was doing what I had been modeled to do by whom I consider the best of the best in the field - providing ethical, cultural contextualized explorations into Indigenous realities with good heart. As fun as these changes were.. they were challenging. Not only was I ALONE with the only other Anthropologist retiring upon my hire, I received backlash from within my own social and behavior science department. Anthropology growth, here, at a tribal institution: "That doesn't make sense. You will never get approval. It will never work," one of the more senior Navajo faculty told me when I suggested building ANT classes. I guess it was easier to go with an outdated stereotype of anthropology instead of stepping into my classroom to re-learn some things. But this also reminded of me why ANT and NAS classes were so desperately needed at a tribal college. Gotta love those neigh sayers.. And here is the bigger thing - I wasn't alone. I started attending the Arizona Articulation Task Force for Anthropology. At these annual meetings ANT faculty convene to evaluate course transferability and discuss curricular alignment between community colleges and the larger three state schools. Not to knock the anthropology peps at the larger institutions, but there is a special connection amongst the community college anthropologists - They get the community college hustle. Our departments are often one person shows, supported with with adjuncts if funding is available, always facing budget cuts, working the 5/5 teaching load, and research... with what time? Regardless of those constant up hill battles, we LOVE what we do. The programs, the summer field trips, the openness to continue fighting for ANT space on degree checklists - we are in it. Not just that...but the people...our conversations are so effortless, never too politically correct, never too soaked in "woe is me," always with humor and always with mad support. Rise in enrollment - RIGHT ON! New class - ROCK IT OUT! Summer field work class in the work - CLAPS AROUND THE ROOM. So supportive, I always volunteer to take notes (without AI) for our meetings. Maybe its the training - but I think there is a special personality that already lends itself to the discipline and the community college space. That doesn't mean we always see eye to eye, or they escape "white guilt," or I leave Vine Deloria's warnings at the door - but we just jive. So when I went to speak this past Saturday at the 2025 SACC Fest - I knew the general crowd and I was excited. SACC stands for Society for Anthropology in Community Colleges (SACC). It is a sub-sector of the AAA for people who teach anthropology in community colleges. These were my people from across the country and they WERE AWESOME.
I talked about my undercover anthropology training, including how I fell into anthropology through unique introductions to archival work in Spain and having the opportunity to correct collections in the Basque country... all for being a Native American in Spain. Is that DEI? I don't know anymore... but in addition to the current political climate that may impact our programs, I shared my engagement of Indigenous animal studies, my failures in Indigenous arts curriculum, and my bringing of life experiences of Indigenous economic systems to the classroom and with dialogue of Marx. They got it.
Their website provides a lot of resources, especially if you are just getting out into the classroom or if you are looking to switch up your course content, approach, or vibe. Moreso, if you are looking for community college Anthropology professional camaraderie - for those who do the 5/5 grind, who continue to wedge in room for research, who are steadily changing how research looks at community colleges... this might be the group for you too. As always, thank you to SACC and to anyone who takes even just a few moments to listen to my work. I am humbled by your presence. - Christine - Diné (Community )College ANT Professor -
0 Comments
Christine Ami Thoughts about re-assessing resistance to change in academia.
Recently, I have witnessed more and more bouts of adult tantrums everywhere. They happen both in response to wanting change and rejecting change. Today, I am focusing on the rejection. Often this come from more tenured faculty and administration who sit in just below the baby boomer generation. Now before you call me an ageist or attempt to write me up for discrimination, I have had some incredible mentors who are considered “elder” who rock the change, lead the change, are the change. So, hear me out - I'm more talking about the general curmudgeon who, regardless of age or experience, find fault with anything of change. This old guard, if you will, calls out the "injustices" of the system yet simultaneously tantrum to any suggested notion of change, shuttering at the possibility of group discussions that may lead to change. They have just enough social credit to have their tantrums heard. These tantrum throwers are setting an example-- what kind of example that is... well you'll have to keep reading. Now don't get me wrong, I understand the chaos of bringing topics to groups settings... especially, let's say, with assessment, advising, curriculum interventions, ... you get the point. It’s stressful and overwhelming, and faculty often want to "just get it over with." I too, hold "old guard" tendencies to following process, policy, and procedure. Change often for me is about following policies that are already in place but that are never enforced. And instead of officially filling complaints when policy, process, procedure, and code of conduct is broken, either because we "don't want to be that person" or because our complaints are not professionally grounded, we tantrum. (Note to self, need to stop that) But what is a tantrum? I'm not the only one to notice this rise in tantrums within professional settings. According to a Workplace Wisdom Blog: "a tantrum is merely a sign that the person does not know how to self-manage or get the result they want, and it is not inherently about you or your own behavior." So when the ONE individual who continually knocks down any new idea simply because of the initiator, it is important to stay calm and remember that is not inherently about the initiator. Consistent resistance between the same faculty (typically old guard vs those who are asking about the possibility of change) is often rooted in something deeper, be it jealousy or finances, including fear related to job security by cuts in programs due to the new changes - which is also a form that green monster. There is the occasional rising leader with touches of delusion that push out tantrums from others; however, I have read that socially grounded delusion with the right team makes for magic, but there is a lot more of the egocentric delusion that lead elsewhere. However, those are blogs for other days. Back to tantrums: What do tantrums look like? Not all tantrums are screaming, cursing, slamming doors, kicking, or throwing objects - although I did have a former old guard colleague once threw his hands up, quit his subcommittee roles, run out of the office into a classroom, and put himself in a corner during a discussion brought forth about the possibility of splitting teaching assignments. That was shocking and probably one of the most blatant and extreme tantrums I have been witness to, although there are some other gems that come close. As Workplace Wisdom presents that other forms of professional tantrums include announced dissatisfaction, then withdrawal, including the reactionary quitting of responsibilities, cold shoulder to the group followed by a distressed run to bosses or higher administration to cry chaos, disorder, and victimization, all in the hope of having their way implemented retroactively. Do tantrums work? Sometimes...but here is the thing about tantrums at work (or any where really), while there may be great points brought forth in their tantrums - such as impacted workloads and stressors associated to unwritten workloads, the unprofessional demonstrations of their justifiable points become hidden behind the behavior. And when that tantrum is then supported by higher ups, it (1) teaches the individual that tantrums work and (2) encourages others to tantrum. What are the ramifications of tantrums? Remember that scenario where a peer stormed off to put himself in a corner, while maybe that was a mechanism to cool down and relieve the overwhelming stress- it certainly wasn't a profession one. I didn't know how to respond - should I have followed him?, should I have begged him to come back? Well… I did both and it was so awkward. Can you image "chasing" an elder down through the hallways to apologize for your creative approach that would cause a slight change intended for a positive student impact? It was horrible! In the end- while that outreach smoothed things over for that situation- the tantrums continued and they got bigger. It turned into he vs me, youth vs. elder, female vs. male, and even "half breed" vs. "full blood" -all from tolerating tantrums. But I was young then and I have learned that elders, well - they can have poor professional behaviors the same as anyone. Today, I do neither of those responses; rather, I situate a judgement of leadership style, something addressed in "Leadership by Tantrum." Watching any tantrum, especially in professional settings, causes my inner dialogue to peek: is this the behavior we must conduct to keep things the same or to change them? Is this tolerated behavior or is this something worthy of reprimand? And then there is the label that comes with. This is how your peers come to know you - tantrum prone, creating dilemmas with in the group including egg shell walking. We know that that peer will quit a responsibility at the drop of resistance from the group. This does not mean the resigning from sub responsibilities is always a tantrum. I have seen them done quite professionally. However, if the tantrum thrower goes to their supervisor/chair/director to demand an administrative intervention to get their way following their resignation, well my friend, that is a tantrum. During those closed door meetings, things are expressed that the tantrum thrower would never voice to the group for the sake of sounding petty and risk DHR involvement against themselves, ultimately pronouncing their tantrum further. When and if the admin do give in to the tantrum, they thwart the sense of collaborative voice of the group. Resentment sets in because the tantrum thrower has now moved into manipulation. Instead of clear communication with their peers, they hide behind systemic conditions. This leads to a whole bunch of other dissonance - including more often tantrums and more tantrum throwers. Sounds childish… well, yeah - so let’s not do that. Prepping for a big change: Thinking about this upward trend of adult tantrums, I am also aware of the massive change our institution is about to embark upon - a new president. Call me utopic, optimistic, and naive (three things that are not often applied to my description lol) as I prepare for the change that will take place with that new leadership direction, a new chapter in our institution that I am excited for, one of stability and innovation. But my realist self is also preparing for the resistance chatter that will be heard at all levels. Shoot, i may not appreciate their vision but if I decide that this is my work home, I need to enact professional mechanisms for diplomacy in change.
So I have settled in to some freelance podcasts and reading on topics of resistance to change in academia. I highly suggest the Diplomacy Master Class by Condoleezza Rice and Madeleine Albright, - these ladies have some pearls in working with old guard/new guard, cold war, and team building that teach that diplomacy is not a chess game but rather billiards. Martha Steward's Master Class also highlights the need to avoid euphemisms such as "pivot" because people are afraid of the word change. Say what you mean - change is a good thing, even if sometimes it doesn’t turn out ideally. Here are some other resources that I found helpful . Patterns of Resistance in Managing Assessment Change Resistance to Organizational Change in Academia Five Strategies for Overcoming Resistance to Change on College Campuses The Rise of Childish Behavior in the Workplace Exploring the "Why" Behind Change Resistance in Higher Education My biggest takeaway from all these blogs and reading are: For tantrum throwers: -recognize your tantrums -develop professional coping mechanisms For those witnessing tantrums: -stay calm -maintain transparent and direct communication (no walking on egg shells for the tantrum thrower) -continue positive reinforcement with yourself and the group -document incidents. Professional misconduct, especially tantrums that lead to hostile work environments, should be professionally reported. For everyone- being passionate about a topic is important, tantrum throwing isn't. If your “passion” seeps into inabilities to calmly discuss with your peers, and leads to closed door rants that include statements such as “if it’s not broke, why fix it” or "Changing now is an inconvenience to me” or if you get too frazzled to even consider that the group may want something different from you, you probably have moved past passion and are in the tantrum zone. PS - you also applies to me - I’ve had my fair share of tantrums- but I have been fortunate for peers who remind me - if I am just going to complain, I am only part of the problem. And if you know of any more sources, put them in the comments below. Who knows... maybe this entire blog is just one tantrum ;) Christine Ami Thoughts on racially charged random facebook messages.
I went to Tábąąh mąʼii's Facebook profile... who is this? Well, she is Christian (not judging just describing her page based on her devotion posts), we have two friends in common both of whom are more public figures than "friends," and now from her Facebook message, she says that she is Tábąąhá from the Western Agency. I go to "search friendship"- Nothing. I go to "message history" - Nothing. I realize that I have no idea who this "friend" is.
I did know that 🦝 has had one direct interaction with me with a question that she just "had to ask," immediately jumped to race, and then apologized(?). For what? For her correct assumption that I do have white ancestry, for her attempted trolling based on race? Honestly, that I don't know. But I did wonder if she messages others with: "I just thought you were were half African American, sorry about that." "I just thought you were were half Hispanic, sorry about that." "I just thought you were were half Anglo, sorry about that." or what I wanted to ask her... "I just thought you were were half Ma'ii, sorry about that." (Joke-splaining Ahead: she is Tábąąhá, ma'ii's are coyote and are overgeneralized as tricksters...and Tábąąh mąʼii means raccoon in Navajo... I know bad joke...but there it is.) To top it off, 🦝 didn't even like my post. The audacity (jk)! 😛 And then, I remembered - there are unfriend and block buttons because I don't need this energy. ❌👎 Really, I don't think anyone needs this energy. And I really love raccoons 🦝 and I have some wonder Tábąąhá friends and students in my life, she doesn't have to be one. I guess my lasting thoughts for the day are - If you have a problem with my clans, if you have a problem with anyone's "anglo-ness" based on their clans, if "passing white" is that big of a problem for you - you can un-friend me. I'm not afraid to talk family histories, or race for that fact. I am not scared to talk about how racist anyone can be, regardless of color or creed. But if your leading commentary is to clarify your understanding of a random person's race for the sake of random knowledge so that you can troll or you "just had to ask," you can do that somewhere else besides my DM. And... I happen to really love my Anglo side... which isn't a side at all. It's all part of me... my Diné-ness, my Anglo-ness. I'm not two people, I don't come from two worlds. I am just Christine, a Táchinii, who loves to bake, and run, and garden, and raise my boys on the rez. I have Jersey Italian relatives and they taught me how to speak fast and go down the shore. I have Kiyáa'aanii relatives that taught me how to weave and throw dirt. And my Bit'ahnii siblings taught me how to ride and love. It's all one world, it's all me, and I certainly don't need anyone to apologize for any part of me. In other news - while you can excuse yourself from my "friendship," do check out my up and coming work about Navajo and Sheep race. Like I said... sheep have taught me tons :) It always hits you when you least expect it - maybe when you most need it. I actually thought my son and his goat Eddie would grow up together. Eddie’s mom rejected him so he became a bottle fed kid. And my youngest son, Chase, took that responsibility seriously. So seriously he would bring you the powder to mix the formula for him before you could even tell him to prep the bottle. He had a bike delivery service all set up. Every morning, when I got hay ready for the animals, he would prep his bike and together we would make it down to the corral to feed the animals. And every evening we would do the same with some extra play time. Tomorrow will be different because today was different. We found Eddie today with terminal injuries, probably getting hit too hard in the corral from another goat. He couldn’t stand or hold his head up. While we tried to feed him and help him, we had to prepare our boys for the change of what isn’t merely schedule but for our 5 year old who took such pride in taking care of Eddie, it would be a change to his life. Eddie wasn’t going to make it.
Our son understood our talk and he was crushed. We spent the afternoon drawing Eddie thanks to Art Hub for Kids. And talked about suffering, death, and hope. He took it all in stride feeling his sadness, loneliness, and fear. “I’m afraid, mom,” he told me. “Eddie is going to die. I’m going to miss him and his buddy is going to miss him,” talking of the one goat kids that would snuggle with Eddie at night.” It was an honest talk we had. No euphemisms, no flowery picture. It was a moment I will remember forever. When we went back to the corral. Eddie was dead, as I suspected of a severed spinal cord due to blunt force trauma. Chase brought his goat away and when he came back down from the mountain, he came to the corral where his older brother and I were at, feeding the sheep and goats. His older brother put his arm around him as they stood looking at the animals eating. He told him how proud he was of the way Chase took care of Eddie. Again, another moment never to be forgotten- not by this mom anyways. We let his tears flow and then we taught him about the herd but it wasn’t us taking care of him. Because as he cried, the 5 remaining kids flooded him with care. They all wanted to know what ailed Chase - how could they make it better. And our son knew that the world couldn’t stop working hard because those kids needed him. Together they grieve. In that moment, the kids - my boys and their baby goats, all took care of each other. Some days these corral lessons are about getting the job done correctly- other days, like today, they are about getting the job done the best way we can - with each other. Christine M. Ami Thoughts on my dissertation advisor's continued impact.
But before I leave you with my Dance with Zoila, I want to encourage all you scholars out there... take a moment to share these memories with your mentors, award or not. I know some may not have had the most carinosa relationship with their advisor as I have/had. And that's not to say that she coddled me. (Remember... in addition to music and laughter...I did say there were also tears 🤣.) Zoila was honest and pushed me academically. But there if there has been mentor who was there for you, academic or not, don't save these words for retirement parties or goodbye speeches. Share them now. To whom it will concern:
“In between corrals, fields, hogans, and classrooms, I was trying to complete my dissertation with a knife in one hand and a pen in the other.” This image is how I often write about my graduate school research experiences bolstered by Dr. Zoila Mendoza. My project focused on the Indigenous sensorial knowledge associated with traditional Diné (Navajo) sheep butchering. At the center of my endeavors were my relationships with Diné people, sheep, Dr. Mendoza, and myself. It took me years to find Dr. Mendoza, and in all honestly, I never even knew that I was looking for her. You see, before my tenure at the University of California Davis in the Department of Native American Studies, I had come from a master’s program elsewhere where every corner echoed “no.” “No, you cannot test in 19th century Indigenous literature.” “No, you cannot used positionality-based writing.” “No, your Indigenous realities do not count as experience with research.” “No, you cannot write from a Dinécentric way of knowing.” “No” was the best manner for the Ivory Tower to deal with this new breed of “Indian Problem,” the ones who had made it passed R1/R2 graduate school admissions, banging on the walls of the Ivory Tower, pleading for manners to incorporate our ways of knowing. I expected this same fight when I stepped onto the UCDavis campus. That was until I sat at the table for Dr. Mendoza’s performance studies graduate seminar. Dr. Mendoza taught me not to bang or beg but rather to be. More specifically, Dr. Mendoza taught me to dance strong in academia. From concise, powerful writing structures to grant sourcing and comprehensive research skills, she taught me the steps. Dr. Mendoza mentored me on how to find music in archival searches, ethnographic research, and linguistic becomings. More-so, she was eager to be my dance partner during graduate school and continues to support me through today. During course work, she let me sing my bloody tales of sheep butchering while she readied her dancing shoes. On my dissertating adventures, she pulled me back onto the dance floor when I tried to quit. And even now, she sits on the side stage, playing her guitar, allowing me to dance in the spotlight to the daunting task of publishing my first book. Her guidance has led me to successful fellowship applications with prestigious academic funding agencies such as the Social Science Research Council, Mellon Foundation, and National Endowment for the Humanities. Her realities of becoming a Guggenheim fellow are now my next foresight. Imagine that – a small Navajo woman, an Indian Child Welfare Act kid, who now teaches and researches at a tribal college – my name listed with Dr. Mendoza as a fellow Guggenheim recipient. Dr. Mendoza has planted those dreams for me in my next dance. Nearly 8 years past my hooding and I find myself as an associate professor at the first tribally establish institution of higher education in the country. I still reflect upon my time at UCDavis and my ever-dancing relationship with Dr. Mendoza. It is that impression that has led me to build Diné College’s first Native American Studies program, to create an Indigenous research agenda, and to foster emerging Indigenous scholars with a firm vision of what was, what is, what could be. I am engaged in the dance of pyro-epistemology at my tribal college. It is a calm, cultivated, cultural burning of the Ivory Tower’s “no,” a calming of wildfires of doubts from administration soaked in internal colonization, and a prayerful and powerful (re)planting of our ways of knowing, just waiting to dance in the wind. All of this is because Dr. Mendoza taught me to simply be in academia. I am fortunate that Dr. Mendoza is only a call away. I hope that I have made her proud in my career and life decisions. But Dr. Mendoza also taught me that it is not her pride that I am in search of, it is pride I find in my own work. I have that. Christine Ami Thoughts on the benefits of book manuscript workshopping
A few months ago, I finalized my first draft of my book manuscript - all 350 pages of it. It was part of my NEH grant objectives, wrapping up some loose ends that I have been working on since my dissertation. At the top of those were addressing concepts of faith in research, Diné metaphysics in everyday life, and my role as the 2018 Miss Navajo Butchering Event Coordinator. I am lucky to have networked and found a group a great scholars who are very well-attuned to the areas I write in and luckily for me, they were gracious to invite me up to their home at the University of Washington. Once there, I would meet with graduate students and faculty, offer a presentation related to one of my chapters, and then workshop the manuscript with a group of scholars interested in my topics. No biggie, right? Before I arrived - my manuscript made a pathway for me. The workshoppers would read it in all its spelling, grammar, and Chicago citation errors. I was excited and nervous for the feedback. What if it sucked? echoed in the back of my head, although I knew it is one hell of a manuscript. But I had questions about certain themes and non-chronological presentation. And of course, what if my writing is too honest? also hung around in my mind. Honesty - its a completely subjective trait but it is my most defining quality. I know that not all agree with it or appreciate it. But this manuscript, however, holds that honesty lens on myself -- a multispecies auto ethnography with sheep as the evaluator. The night I arrived - I had dinner with Jose Antonio Lucero, MaríaElena Garcia, and their son. A welcoming of spicy foods that I have soo missed since having toddlers who opt out of the dichíí. It was also homecoming dinner in some fashion for my project. Tony was there at the very beginning of my dissertation's journey - back when I was still trying to find my voice in academia, when I felt like no one would want my work, that no one would want me. But Tony and the 2011 Social Science Research Council Dissertation Proposal Development Fellowship Global Indigenous Politics Cohort did... From that space, I met a powerful group of scholars, Indigenous and allies, many of whom have become my people - the ones I turn to and those who turn to me. Included in that group is MaríaElena, who would eventually become part of my dissertation committee, guiding me in the areas of Indigenous experiences co-existing with nonhuman animals. It had been 11 years since our last meeting - and while our stories showed the passing of time, our meal together was as effortless as if it had been 11 months. My presentation went off without a problem - it was great being in front of a crowd again. It was something that I missed since COVID set in. In the seats where scholars who I had intellectually grown up through, including Dr. Charlotte Coté! I wish I got a photo 🤣🤦🏽♀️. There were was also a fellow Aggie - Dr. Joshua Reid whose recent work is now informing my own. Missed my photo opt there too. 🤣🤦🏽♀️ Now that I think of it.... I missed all photo opts unless it was of food or the weather...🤣🤦🏽♀️ By the way.... I missed dining out... the food in Seattle - all the shell fish- it was AMAZING! But back to business.
In the group there were Native American Studies scholars, literary scholars, political science scholars, animal studies scholars, performance studies scholars, geography scholars, and friends. Radhika Govindrajan, who I had admired since one of my SSRC Global Politics cohort members introduced me to her work and who had also met with me during the start of my sabbatical, joined the table via zoom. I was astonished by the people who took the time to read me - some of them coming in from their own sabbatical to chat about this project. There were even graduate students who joined in, not merely in presence but also in voice! I didn't know what I would take away from the meeting before we started, but looking back in hindsight, this is what I can tell you: They helped me to see my overarching picture and end game that I, myself, was couldn't quite see from up close. They had me talk out where I had loose ends. Despite not being weavers, they could feel how I spoke of weaving and broken warps and they forced me to put names to those broken warps. In that theoretical framework, they encouraged me to embrace the messiness of the interventions that I have to make in Native American Studies, animal studies, Diné studies, history, anthropology, and academic writing in general. The honesty that I was afraid to share, they found comforting, even in my personal writings of loss, both human and nonhuman animals lives that have shaped me. That was the most shocking for me of the workshop- how the deaths in my writings came through. While the project focuses on sheep deaths, I didn't realize that I wrote so heavily about the death of my brother, of my grandparents, of sheep, and of mountain sheep as movements in my life that I had to overcome. But it was the first thing that the group brought up... condolences and gratitude for sharing those intimacies - intimacies that are part of our every day life now - opioid wars, becoming an elder as our grandparents move on into the next world, picking up stewardship responsibilities because our animals have chosen us. It was a lot to take in, a lot of voices and opinons - and I wrote down as much as I could in a newly christened writing journal that had been just gifted to me by the organizers of the group of MaríaElena, Tony, Josh and Radhika. Sitting in the airport, taking the last of my meals without my boys, I set up my laptop to write emails of gratitude - here is what I have to say to each one of those individuals who are committed to helping other scholars grow... not just me -- but all those they can.
Boarding the plane back to Albuquerque, my boots now have dust from a different field that I bring home to my field. In short, if you ever have an opportunity to workshop your book manuscript - DO IT. Sure, it might be a plane ride and a few time zones away. But you may just come home with corn seeds from fields that you didn't know you needed. Christine Ami Thoughts about 2nd reader feedback and the completion of my NEH Award objectives
Pretty inspiring comments coming from the second reader of my NEH application, if I don't say so myself lol. By far, these were the most negative comments I received and the lowest ranking score I was given in my successful run for a NEH Awards for Faculty felllowship. Good thing the other readers thought otherwise. The other readers provided feedback taking into consideration my application as well as my letters of recommendation and my CV. Yet, regardless of the lines and lines of support from the other readers, for some reason, I just can't shake the feedback from that second reader. And I actually received the grant....Am I alone? I can't be the only one who let's the 2nd reader get under their skin, can I? You can judge for yourself as the NEH selected to showcase my project as a sample for future applicants to read. Check out Narrative Section of a Successful Application. Even better... rank it yourself and put that rank in the comments below... lol. It's not just this application, the 2nd reader stigma has and always will be the bane of publishing hopefuls. This is the same in the grant and fellowship worlds. For those who don't know what / who a 2nd reader is - its basically the person presses and funders bring on to kill your publishing vibe... lol just kidding: It's usually the 2 review of your application or article and their job is to be a critical as possible. They are not there for the feels - they are there to find the holes you have left that could discredit your chance of actually completing a fellowship or any gaps that you have in articles that would discredit the press who is publishing your piece. But here is the thing... I've been the second reader. And with grants like this one, livelihoods come down to these reads....literally tens of thousands of dollars that let academics pursue dreams. If someone honestly thinks that a junior scholar is incapable because of lack of publishing, lack of letters of recommendation support, whatever - they have to point it out. I've seen it within my own institution, faculty or staff receive the luxurious work load release to research and publish and when the time comes to produce the final deliverables - there is no research or publishable piece to present. So I understand. But still, hey, second reader, have you heard Taylor Swift's song, you know the one were haters be hatin'. Well that's how you came in....and I was like.... damn, it's only 7am. So to my second reader, No offense (so you know I am here to offend), but I don't know if you have met junior scholars like me - the Indigenous scholars who are ridden hard by the academic system and put away wet. I know that sounds harsh and perhaps a bit crude but that is where the scholars like me come from. As minorities in R1 institutes, everyone wants a piece of us so they can claim diversity and equity, whatever that means. As type A personalities in tribal colleges, everyone expects we pick up everyone else's slack. (And if you are offended by the wet horses comment, clearly you have never had horses, sickos 😆. You should be more offended if you are part of the groups who stand by as we are put away wet). We have learned to dry ourselves off. And you will never see the towels we use because we have a home support system that helps us balance our well-being. Our home may not be our biological relatives, but humans and nonhuman animals that have melted into our lives that wish us to succeed for who we are and not what we can provide for them. Our drive will out race almost anyone in short or long distance runs, regardless of diversity or other merit based opportunities. If it sounds like a lot, it is - but that's what we, high driven, motivated Indigenous junior scholars do. We show up to cook and stay to clean up. We put in the grant fellowship applications and make rocks move so that we can finish them. Because if we don't, that gives others, especially those who have never met Indigenous scholars, the right to speak of our 'diversity given' opportunity and not of our stellar ethics, both in the work place and in the community. I know your job is hard, but when you see a packet like mine fly into your email or be placed on your desk for review - you should listen to our recommenders when they tell you of what we are capable of. If our plans seem impossible of a task, ask yourself, is it unfeasible or is it just unfeasible for you. Look at the C.V. and read in between the lines, where grant management overlap, dissertation completions, and faculty of the year awards. That is not by coincidence, nor given by diversity, or gifted by administrations - that is the work of our horse. I don't want an award because I am an "Indian in Academia," I want an award because I aspire and I can do. If you don't read between the lines, if you don't justify your decision beyond "it doesn't seem feasible" it just looks like you need an excuse to award someone else. Provide suggestions on how to make it feasible. Keep taking on roles as the 2nd reader. I took every single feedback you did provide and made it happen. I made sure that my story in my multi-species autobiographic manuscript highlighted the struggles of a junior Indigenous scholar, including my moments of doubt in me... I actually reduced my interdisciplinary connections because that was the dissertation's job - this book's job is to provide applications of real world experiences to reach broader community and academic realms... I contacted minority serving institutes across the nation to not only pitch this project and possible collaboration but to make them aware of grants their institutes could apply to meet their own program's food sovereignty, indigenous research, and community grounded projects come to life... And I built a new home of scholars to help me workshop this manuscript into its final publishing format - it is a team of individuals who, in fact, believe that the evidence is evident of successful objective outcomes. I know that not every scholar is like me. And I know that I can't be awarded every grant or fellowship that I apply to. But make your feedback, 2nd reader, count for improvement.
Christine Ami Thoughts about Sheep Is Life, the 2023 Window Rock Celebrations, and my first presentation with edits from the Navajo Lifeways group.
But this year's 2023 Sheep Is Life Celebrations in Window Rock, Arizona moved me to throw on my good boots, the ones that rarely see the corral, with some coral and Navajo pearls. On Saturday June 17th, with a mask and sanitizer ready, I headed to our Nation's capital. After a year of editing I am on the last leg of author edits of my book project prior to submission to the editors. Presenting helps to remind me of my chapter story lines, receive feedback from community members on my interpretations, and reinvigorates my project and the sprouts from the main research. And if there was a crowd I wanted to speak in front of, it was this one. So I stepped out - unsure of what was more daunting: presenting my findings to the group who spent years teaching me or stepping out into a world that has relaxed its COVID prevention protocols. Paranoid?, maybe. Crazy?, possibly. Nervous?, absolutely. I arrived at the Navajo Nation Museum and saw so many beautiful familiar faces. They were chatting, working with fibers, selling rugs, jewelry, paintings, and shirts. Most were sheep themed - it made me which I wore my black sheep shirt :) I also noticed the missing presence of those hadn't made it to this side of the pandemic because of age, because of sickness, because of life. The warm sun and slight breeze meshed those memories with the current realities. It felt good to be touched by it all and to be around this group. I made my way to the auditorium, removed my mask, hooked up my wireless mic, and started speaking. Maybe it was because this was my first in person presentation about my work in the dust of COVID - maybe it was because I was just grateful to be alive, when so many hadn't made it to this dust trail - maybe it was because my husband was in the crowd for the first time. What ever it was, as I spoke I became more and more grateful. During my presentation, it hit hard -- the positive impact of the Diné be' iiná: Navajo Lifeways organization - the people, the histories, the sheep. They have been part of my journey, integrating a Navajo girl who grew up mostly off the reservation into a confident Táchinii woman who grows with the land and animals of the Chuskas. A lot of people talk about how difficult it is returning home to live, finding a job, fitting in - but it wasn't like that for me. While it may have been daunting, it wasn't something that I was going to shy away from. I accepted positions in the dorm before working up to an associate professor and grant manager for the Navajo Cultural Arts Program. All along, I was raising sheep, or as my book dives into, they were raising me. It had been in my dreams from childhood that I would return - and I have - but never along. My grandparents, family, sheep, shadow, and this Diné be' iina: Navajo Lifeways group helped me to secure my footing.
We have woven together, run together, butchered together, eaten together, celebrated together, and complained together. I was particularly excited to share with Sheep Is Life's audience the introduction of the Indigenous Animals Studies curriculum at Diné College. This was an important result of my dissertation and my conversations with the individuals I met through the Navajo Lifeways Organization. In particular, at my very first focus group at Roy's house, a group assembled to butcher with me and to help me to fine tune questions for my dissertation. Roy himself suggested asking about what classes students could take to reconnect with nonhuman animals and if students would be interested in them. Turns out they were and now they can - so thank you, Dine Be'Iina Inc, for hosting not just Sheep Is Life, but for living it :) You have helped me live it too!
Sheep Is Life, I'll see you next year - hopefully with a book in hand! If you would like to check out the presentation - I speak for about 30 minutest starting at the 50 minute marker: https://www.facebook.com/709240484/videos/6530199793698042/ Christine Ami Thoughts on creating curriculum that supplements inherent Indigenous approaches to reengaging animal relationships. Coffee is the Start to All Great Days: We grab some coffee from the 1st floor of Diné College's Ned Hatalthi Center Building and make our way to my office - a room that has been vacant for the last year because of my sabbatical. These days it is more of a storage area than a place of critical thought or student advising. Embarrassed by the dust and clutter, I make room for Dr. Kelsey Dayle John to sit down and we start chatting about horses, sheep, dissertations, and life as Diné women, ranchers, and academics. I met Kelsey after googling resources on Indigenous animal studies. I had found abstracts of articles that spoke to me as if we were writing from the same space: Diné relationships with nonhuman animals. She focuses on horses 🐴 and I sheep 🐑, both animals that have been written off as acculturated nonhuman animals acquired during colonial contacts 🇪🇸🙄. I tried to access her dissertation, book chapters, and articles but our library unfortunately did not have subscriptions. So, like any good academic - I stalked Kelsey on Facebook 👀 and asked for copies via messenger 🤣. We got to chattin' online and, boy, did we have a lot in common! I shared this blog about my manuscript writing adventures. She sent videos and articles and let me know that she would be organizing the Horses Connecting Communities gather. This would be the 3rd annual community learning space that will take place June 17-18 at Diné College Rodeo Grounds to honor and perpetuate the legacy between Diné people and horses (PSSST - there is still time to register and attend so get on it!). We planned to meet up during one of her visits to Tsaile ... coffee - it was decided as a good meeting place :) More than Animal Studies: Meeting Kelsey was a breath of fresh air because she made me feel normal about my thoughts about Animal Studies as a Navajo woman who works and lives with livestock. She had completed her dissertation a few years after I did. As we talked I wished we had met earlier, when I was in the trenches of writing. My biggest hang up during that time period was deciding if Animal Studies was what I was doing. I mean, I was justifying Diné relationships with nonhuman animals with the non Indigenous trending studies, using the lingo, had committee members dedicated to the field ... but what I was writing about was/is taught to me by animals (domesticated, wild, dreamt). It is much older than the academic field of Animal studies; it is much more prestigious than academia itself. Kelsey got that. Purpose of Human Animal Studies Classes at Diné College: So I shared with her our new courses on animal studies from Indigenous standpoints that I had been working on as part of my larger NEH award. This part of my award was also an updating of my Animal Studies repertoire. I read A LOT of topics within the realms of Human Animal Studies, Animal Narratology, Critical Animal Studies, and Animal Science. I looked at curriculum in place and suggestions of how to create Traditional Ecological Knowledge lessons from places like Dr. Seafha Ramos' website Stem Trading Card: TEK Lessons. I checked out books like Dr. Margo DeMello's edited volume Teaching the Animal: Human–Animal Studies across the Disciplines (2010) to justify course descriptions and draft letters to adiministration. And I read as many of the Indigenous scholars I could find who worked with nonhuman animal relationships (enter my fb stalking of Kelsey lol). I found blogs to be a wonderful space to talk outloud. Dr. Zoe Todd's website Specultative fish-ctions helped me to organize my own website and blog (even how to find space to promote our family's art business - check it out).
The courses are spread across the Anthropology and Native American Studies disciplines and are meant to transition out ANT111: Introduction to Cultural Anthropology and usher in approaches that understand culture beyond anthropocentrism, beyond primitive studies of Indigenous peoples and cultures. More specifically, they are closely aligned to four of Diné College Strategic Goals in 2022:
Human Animal Studies Series ANT116: Introduction to Human-Animal Studies: This course explores relationships between humans and other animals, as well as ideas that humans have about animals. Topics will include introduction and application of fundamental concepts of Human-Animal Studies (HAS) as they apply to human-animal economies, attitudes toward animals, and animals in art, belief systems and literature. ANT216: Animals as Commodities: Through Human-Animal Studies (HAS) frameworks, the class analyzes three areas in which non-human animals “serve” humans: as food, as pets, and as research tools. Students will explore notions of power and difference, ethics and responsibility, and creativity in re-imagining the status quo of human-nonhuman animal relationships. NAS316: Indigenous Relationships with Nonhuman Animals: This course deconstructs anthropocentrism (human-centered perspective) to understand how Indigenous relationships between human and nonhuman animals are created, maintained, and destroyed. The class considers critiques of the Social Sciences, STEM, and Humanities’ approaches to human-nonhuman relations offered by Indigenous peoples, scholars, and knowledge holders and culminates with specific praxis to reestablish those relationships between human and more than human. NAS416: Indigenous Relationships beyond Death of Nonhuman Animals: This class intersects Animal Science, Animal Studies, and Native American and Indigenous Studies to explore how, where, and why non-human animals die. Through case studies grounded in Indigenous ways of knowing, the class will analyze how relationships between human and non-human animals continue before, during, and after the death of the non-human animal. Example topics may include Makah whale hunts, Andean guinea pig butchering, and Hupa, Yurok, and Karuk salmon fishing among others. The class will culminate in technical workshops guided by cultural teachings of traditional Diné sheep butchering. What do the Discpline Prefixes and Course Levels Indicate? None of these classes have prerequisites, because in reality relationships between human and nonhuman animals can start anywhere, at any level, or at anytime. But the NAS classes allow for a sensory component to learning that the ANT classes don't engage as much. While students learn how to conduct multi-species ethnographies in the 116 and 216 classes, it is not until the 316 and 416 classes where we work with Dinécentric sensorial arenas. Students are required to work with their own livestock or assist with Diné College's Land Grant Office and their animals to reengage communication with both human and nonhuman animals. So why bother with the ANT classes at all? For starters they meet the general education degree checklist 😆. I am currently working on NAS meeting that criteria on its own. In the meantime, this has helped to facility other programs, such as the Animal Science degrees here at Diné College to add these classes to their degree checklists. But beyond checklists - the ANT classes bring me back advice by my doctoral advisors, Dr. Mendoza and Dr. Vareses, who told me as a Navajo Native American Studies scholar I will need to know both Western and Indigenous approaches, theories and trends just as well as, if not better than, scholars from the so-called main stream disciplines. It will only add to my tools in my tool kit and give me an upper hand in any debate or dialogue. I have taken that into my own pedogogical practices. Often you will hear me tell students "do not throw the baby out with the bath water." Just because they are written by non-Indigenous scholars, doesn't mean they aren't helpful in articulation or thought processes - even if it is to deconstruct their own discipline. Therefore, the ANT classes introduce unique perspectives from both Western and Indigenous ways of knowing on how we relate with animals. This information helps us to grow how we look at ourselves. The NAS class will allow for us to focus on how we as Indigenous people dialogue and depart from other Indigenous communities throughout the globe. ✅ Update current trends in Animal Studies literatures, practices, and curriculum
✅ Create Indigenous Animal Studies courses to accompany my book manuscript Classes are open to all Diné College students and will be taught in rotation. Thank you to all those great minds, scholars, teachers, and community members, who have helped bring these courses to life! Don't forget to register!!!! Christine Ami Thoughts on the acronym trend in academia and Indigenous ways of knowing. BANG! Blood seeps from the sheep’s eye and nose as she falls to the ground. It is my first time in a USDA slaughterhouse and the first time I had seen a bolt gun used to kill a sheep. I am sick to my stomach but trying not to let it show as I stood with friends, Ph.D. Candidates in the biomedical field who had invited me with them as they extracted sheep brain samples for their cancer research. BANG! “How different is this butchering from your butchering,” my friend asked as he harvested the brains from a decapitated sheep head and then tossed the head into a bucket that will be marked for disposal.
BANG! As blood drains into a sewer for disposal from the first sheep's headless neck, another sheep falls to the ground and is lifted to a meat rack. That feeling in my stomach continues but not for the exposure to death. I have seen plenty of livestock butchered at home on the Navajo Nation and had a fair number of butchers under my belt before stepping into that building. BANG! It is the approach, the trivialization of lives that catches me off guard for some reason: Watching as other sheep watched each other die. I mean, I knew where I was going (to a USDA slaughter facility), I knew why I was going there (to start work with USDA sheep butchers), but still a sickness formed in my stomach that I had to learn to work through or with to complete my dissertation research. BANG! Did I need to butcher like this?, I thought. No, but I was there to learn so I did my best to push through it to see if I could do just that. Learning from them was difficult... but then I met Navajo butchers who worked in the slaughterhouses and who encouraged me to learn with them because maybe I would understand. To my surprise I did, and the sickness went away because of them and my insight to slaughterhouses and Indigenous butchers transformed. BANG! This sickness in my stomach has once again touched me; this time as I transition my dissertation into a book manuscript. I returned in 2022 to the research realm since my 2016 graduation. It was a timely break from my 5/5 teaching load and grant work. I knew where I was going (back into the world of written academia, a place that belittles Indigenous ways of knowing and where Indigenous scholars are attempting to make major headway in changing that space) and I knew why I was going (to catch up on trends, verbiage, scholarship, emerging Indigenous scholars). To my surprise, human-animal studies is in a huge boom; everyone is talking about “the more-than-human.” It is now cool to talk about what many Indigenous people still do, people who actually live these ways of knowing and being and who embrace these responsibilities since time immemorial. While the trendy of what I write about took me off guard in terms of self-doubt about what makes my project distinct and if animals studies is what I actually do; what made my stomach turn - my BANG! is the absolutely astounding use of acronyms being employed by Indigenous and ally scholars to engage Indigenous Research Methods and Methodologies and ways of knowing. IWOK: Indigenous Ways of Knowing TKHs: Traditional Knowledge Holders IRM: Indigenous Research Methods TEK: Traditional Ecological Knowledge ISW: Indigenous Storywork ISW 4RS: Indigenous Storywork Four R's of Storywork IK: Indigenous Knowledge SNBH: Sa'ah Naaghai Bik'éh Hozhóón and here is one that literally induced laughter: OMC: Old Man Coyote And the list continues… BANG! BANG! BANG! Over and over. Individuals who are publishing to teach others of the power and dangers of Indigenous praxis have created a trend of trivializing concepts, practices, collaborators, beings into a few letters because despite their claims of these ways of knowing as being ever so almighty, their academic labels are just too cumbersome to write out. Isn't it already problematic enough that we have the academic labels as it is? But I won't go there today. The best case scenarios (please sense the sarcasm) occur when an acronym is employed without indicating what it stands for as if TKHs is so well spread, that all readers - including the alleged most important readers of Indigenous scholars... the community members - know what those letters are. (Here is Perdue Owl's help to properly use acronyms). I... myself... a community member and academic still has to google these letters. Just last week I received an invitation to offer a IWOK keynote, but I had no idea what IWOK is and it was never spelled. I had to google it... (No - I did not accept the invitation) WHO ARE YOU/WE WRITING FOR? Don’t get me wrong I use acronyms- more than I like - mostly prefixes for classes like NAS for Native American Studies. And in my syllabus you will find SNBH because it is required as part of our academic policy to include the verbatim statement. Then there is the checking of the AI/AN box for demographic selections in surveys and such. It is not just with Native American and Indigenous studies and those trying their best to engage these approaches; people everywhere are taking acronyms to the extreme. I hear ads on the radio for MBC, a condensed version for metastatic breast cancer. It’s as if we can’t say cancer anymore, we need to trivialize everything to acronyms. When I read that scholarship with these acronyms, my stomach turned because I asked myself: do I need to use these acronyms now? I saw these Indigenous scholars, Navajo scholars, doing it. So I tried it. BANG - the bolt gun was now in my hand. My stomach turned. It wasn’t like I was learning from lifelong practitioners as I did with the Navajo butchers who work in slaughter facilities. I returned to those acronym soup readings and even worse, memories of hearing Indigenous and ally scholars using acronyms for these being (FYI: people actually say I-R-M out loud in conversation), and I realized that it is the scholars that use the acronyms that I was questioning. Regardless of how meaningful or impactful their articles, books, lectures are, their uses of acronyms make me question their actual engagement; the use of those acronyms make me question if they actually experience these power and are willing to at all costs teach their children of the dangers. For example Jo-ann Archibald (2019), who employs an alphabet soup of acronyms, elucidates seven "ISW" principles: "that facilitate meaning making through and with Indigenous stories, which may be of a traditional nature or about lived experiences" as if Indigenous ways of knowing is segregated traditional stories from lived experiences. She may have gems in this piece but her used of acronyms take away from what she and her collaborators have to say. Not to mention that this alleged segregation she suggest offers an impression that she doesn't understand how the "lived" and the "traditional nature" are all enveloped into one. In fact, her use of acronyms is the only thing creating a segregation between the two. It actually makes me giggle think: Do scholars who use these acronyms go into the hogan and say outloud: "Wow, this IK hit me so hard," sit in the teepee and tell the roadman: "you are one bad ass TKH," or head out to gather herbs and shout to the tree tops: "hey, this TEK is powerful"? I doubt it. Will the Holy People know what you are saying if you sing "SNBH" instead of the full verses? I'm not willing to risk it. And I am not just isolating Archibald for the fun of it. I am sure that those of you reading this blog are selecting your own example... WE are using acronyms everywhere. And I say we, because I, you, them, are we. We are the scholars and academics that continue to perpetuate this denigration. It just so happens that a chapter of Archibald was just the fortunate one to be assigned as a reading to my husband in his Indigenous Research Methods class this past week. So it is fresh in my memory. There is no separation from between traditional and lived experience. Scholars are doing it to ourselves with engagements such as these (do I need to go into internal colonization discussions here?) Works like Archibald's work is a perfect example of Indigenous scholars isolating themselves further because these alphabet soup readings make their way back to our communities; sometimes because there is a topic provoked and other times we are just trying to figure out who these scholars are, where they come from, what clan they are, and when are they home. I learned that many (not all) are individuals who are vacationers to their homelands at best. They don’t want to relearn their language, only write of language loss. They don't want to engage with Indigenous research within their homelands, only in the city. They don’t want to become cultural artists, only do a couple of workshops and celebrate their temporal reconnections with raw materials. They don’t want to engage these ways of knowing at home as daily, seasonal obligations, only teach about Indian magic as a nostalgic or exotic propaganda tool used to enchant colleagues, students, and funders. In short - they never plant but still teach the Corn Pollen Road of Life. "Chill, Christine. Why are you so angry," I asked myself out loud. "Because these beings, what have been reduced to a few letters, can literary cure cancer. They keep the world in balance and bring life and death," I responded to myself. When Indigenous and ally researchers use acronyms for these powers, they trivialize methods, collaborators, and extra-intellectual ways of knowing for the sake of ease and trend. I remember speaking with an elder at our college about the use an the acronym for Sa'ah Naaghai Bik'éh Hozhóón and the complications of it use within a Western academic setting. He told me he understand why I was upset about the acronym and the institutionalization this being. But we talked it out. He explained to me that he used it because he didn't want students and non-Navajo faculty to feel intimidated with pronunciation at the time of the College's origins. It brought us back the age old language discussion and the major question of being able to pray in our language for ourselves and our loved ones; how we have made it "okay" to take short cuts by using English. It brings me back to: Will the Holy People know what you are saying if you use only English in your prayers and substitute the acronym of SNBH instead of the full verses. In the case of acronyms, we, Indigenous scholars, are pulling ourselves away - no one else to blame here. Memories of that discussion help me to move through the anger into a new place -- how to approach this trend. I think of the institutionalization of young Indigenous scholars now - maybe, like myself, they felt/feel pressured to use the acronym because they were/are trying to prove that they can do the academic thing just as well as anyone else. Maybe they picked up the bolt gun because they thought there was no other option. So I returned to personal accountability: Do I need to use these acronyms? My response is: “I will not.” I have sat up too many nights praying and singing for cures, I have been visited by one too many “nonhuman” animals, I have been informed by one too many dreams, I have teared over one too many failed crops because of drought and over one too many snowstorms that blessed our fields. I have fell asleep at one too many sings, been yelled at by one too many medicine persons, have been home long enough to know that reducing these ways of knowing to 3 or 4 letters is mockery. If you use these acronyms in your scholarship or speak with them in classes, at lecture, or with friends, pause and think about this: If you can't spell out Indigenous Ways of Knowing, Traditional Knowledge Holders, if these words, concepts, beings are taking up too much of your word count; if you cannot even try to pronounce Navajo philosophies, maybe these things don't mean as much to you as you claim they do in your publishings or in your life for that matter. Am I judging us? Only as much as we judge the non-Native scholars who denigrate, dismiss, and belittle our ways of knowing. Perhaps you will read this as too conservative, perhaps you will see me as a lateral oppressor, that’s okay. I don’t need an acronym to accept that although YDL would work well here. Those Navajo butchers who work in meat processing facilities taught me so much about the power of life and death of these ways of knowing in a "sterile" Western environment and how that extends into their work and our lives. They taught me how to maneuver: when and how to pick up the bolt gun and when the knife. I thank them for helping me through those BANGs. Their work and applications of Diné ways of knowing within a slaughterhouse make more sense to me than acronym usage within Indigenous thought, philosophy, and pedagogy pieces. For the scholar who use these acronyms and, consciously or not, trivialize our ways of living, I hope this is your BANG! Writing this blog was certainly one for me - no more acronyms in writings and no more in my syllabus. It's small but its a step. Life’s not easy nor is it trendy - so stop making these approaches as if they were. |
AuthorJust a Tách'inii thinking out loud about butchering, researching, manuscript writing, and life on the Navajo reservation. Archives
January 2025
Categories
All
|